Final sales, especially for durable goods, appear to be stalling out. That's not a good sign. If we weren't waiting for the other shoe to drop on housing and the financial markets, this might be regarded as a decent GDP report. But consumption is likely to contract in the current quarter. The question is, how much?
Contributions to GDP growth
Categories:
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://www.williampolley.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/904
2 Comments
Leave a comment
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by William Polley published on November 30, 2007 9:13 AM.
Bernanke: "Headwinds" for the consumer likely in months ahead was the previous entry in this blog.
A really good paper on bankruptcy reform is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
Categories
- A Blog is Born (6)
- About This Blog (20)
- Blogging and Computers (24)
- College Teaching (39)
- Economics -- Europe (2)
- Economics--China (44)
- Economics--Data (65)
- Economics--International (General) (47)
- Economics--Labor Market (34)
- Economics--Micro and Markets (88)
- Economics--Real Estate (30)
- Economics--Teaching (67)
- Economics-Energy (29)
- Economics-Fiscal Policy (33)
- Economics-Inequality (4)
- Economics-Inflation (43)
- Economics-Recession (60)
- Election 2004 (27)
- Federal Reserve (178)
- Financial Markets (92)
- Fun (43)
- General Economics (183)
- Good Blogging (26)
- History (23)
- Journalism (5)
- Mathematica (2)
- Minnesota (21)
- Obituaries (28)
- Other (62)
- Photos (5)
- Politics (27)
- Science (27)
- Social Security (42)
- Sports (35)
- Weather (14)
- Western Illinois (18)
Monthly Archives
- May 2010 (2)
- April 2010 (7)
- March 2010 (2)
- February 2010 (3)
- January 2010 (2)
- December 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (5)
- August 2009 (10)
- July 2009 (2)
- June 2009 (3)
- May 2009 (4)
- April 2009 (4)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (11)
- January 2009 (7)
- December 2008 (9)
- November 2008 (4)
- October 2008 (22)
- September 2008 (24)
- August 2008 (18)
- July 2008 (2)
- June 2008 (6)
- May 2008 (18)
- April 2008 (12)
- March 2008 (23)
- February 2008 (24)
- January 2008 (14)
- December 2007 (25)
- November 2007 (12)
- October 2007 (36)
- September 2007 (24)
- August 2007 (41)
- July 2007 (24)
- June 2007 (12)
- May 2007 (21)
- April 2007 (18)
- March 2007 (5)
- February 2007 (17)
- January 2007 (17)
- December 2006 (17)
- November 2006 (14)
- October 2006 (24)
- September 2006 (28)
- August 2006 (16)
- July 2006 (6)
- June 2006 (10)
- May 2006 (5)
- April 2006 (15)
- March 2006 (25)
- February 2006 (25)
- January 2006 (20)
- December 2005 (15)
- November 2005 (29)
- October 2005 (38)
- September 2005 (43)
- August 2005 (42)
- July 2005 (18)
- June 2005 (20)
- May 2005 (34)
- April 2005 (53)
- March 2005 (44)
- February 2005 (55)
- January 2005 (44)
- December 2004 (30)
- November 2004 (38)
- October 2004 (21)
- September 2004 (12)

Great chart. If I'm interpreting it right, you can't find total GDP on the chart. Be nice to have a line showing that on the chart. Did you do it in Excel?
Yes, I did in Excel (in a hurry). There probably is a way to put a line showing the actual growth rate--which is the difference between the amount on the positive side and the amount on the negative side. The St. Louis Fed does one of these too.
http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/net/20071201/netpub.pdf
(go to page 6).
James Hamilton has done something similar without stacking them.
http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2007/11/new_gdp_figures.html
I think the stacking (like the St. Louis Fed does) gives it an interesting visualization.