On this day when the perils of largely unregulated markets are all to clear comes news of a merger that will in all likelihood mean better diversification of risk in a regulated market. CME Signs Deal for Nymex (Wall Street Journal)
A little ironic that this deal was inked today
Categories:
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://www.williampolley.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/983
2 Comments
Leave a comment
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by William Polley published on March 17, 2008 1:06 PM.
If you read one article today... was the previous entry in this blog.
Welcome new readers is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
Categories
- A Blog is Born (6)
- About This Blog (19)
- Blogging and Computers (22)
- College Teaching (32)
- Economics -- Europe (2)
- Economics--China (44)
- Economics--Data (58)
- Economics--International (General) (44)
- Economics--Labor Market (30)
- Economics--Micro and Markets (77)
- Economics--Real Estate (14)
- Economics--Teaching (64)
- Economics-Energy (28)
- Economics-Fiscal Policy (15)
- Economics-Inequality (4)
- Economics-Inflation (37)
- Economics-Recession (10)
- Election 2004 (27)
- Federal Reserve (167)
- Financial Markets (52)
- Fun (36)
- General Economics (171)
- Good Blogging (25)
- History (15)
- Journalism (4)
- Mathematica (1)
- Minnesota (20)
- Obituaries (23)
- Other (54)
- Photos (5)
- Politics (13)
- Science (24)
- Social Security (42)
- Sports (33)
- Weather (13)
- Western Illinois (14)
Monthly Archives
- August 2008 (16)
- July 2008 (2)
- June 2008 (6)
- May 2008 (18)
- April 2008 (12)
- March 2008 (23)
- February 2008 (24)
- January 2008 (14)
- December 2007 (25)
- November 2007 (12)
- October 2007 (36)
- September 2007 (24)
- August 2007 (41)
- July 2007 (24)
- June 2007 (12)
- May 2007 (21)
- April 2007 (18)
- March 2007 (5)
- February 2007 (17)
- January 2007 (17)
- December 2006 (17)
- November 2006 (14)
- October 2006 (24)
- September 2006 (28)
- August 2006 (16)
- July 2006 (6)
- June 2006 (10)
- May 2006 (5)
- April 2006 (15)
- March 2006 (25)
- February 2006 (25)
- January 2006 (20)
- December 2005 (15)
- November 2005 (29)
- October 2005 (38)
- September 2005 (43)
- August 2005 (42)
- July 2005 (18)
- June 2005 (20)
- May 2005 (34)
- April 2005 (53)
- March 2005 (44)
- February 2005 (55)
- January 2005 (44)
- December 2004 (30)
- November 2004 (38)
- October 2004 (21)
- September 2004 (12)

Actually, there are similarities between Bear Stearns. I worked at both firms and was at Continental when it melted down. Continental was highly levered and funded with short term hot money. It was overexposed to oil and gas and real estate. It teetered for months until it melted down in 24 hours. A rumor about liquidity started in Asia and as the markets opened in Europe the crisis accelerated and by the time the US markets opened, the bank was toast. It felt just as quick as the Bear situation.
Mark,
I think you meant this comment to go with the other post (on Continental). Thanks for writing. I wasn't there, so my knowledge is through the pages of history. It's true that the real meltdown (the run on the bank) took place on a single day. What struck me as the difference was the speed with which it was resolved. According to the written accounts, the run was in May and the FDIC didn't buy their assets until July. This was possible because, being a commercial bank, the Fed's discount window (and other creditors) kept them afloat for those two months.
Without direct access to the discount window, Bear Stearns went from failure to buyout in hours rather than months. Now, the new lending facility announced by the Fed last night should prevent that from happening again. (And so future episodes might play out more like Continental's did.) Too late for Bear Stearns, of course, and I would expect a lot of post-mortem examination of that fact.
Thanks again!